NAME: Stephanie Pope
DATE AND TIME: 03/02/2015
LOCATION: Chandler 260 lab, Columbia University
SUBJECT: Cuttlefish bone casting

Cuttlefish protocol developed prior to class


Before class on Monday, I took a look at the various references to casting using cuttlefish 'bone' that Jef sent over by email. I made some protocol notes to the following effect:


Preparation


After discussing the various references to cuttlefish prepping in the manuscript, I partnered with Caroline and Celia to prepare our cuttlefish bones according to the description on f. 91r – by rubbing the bone in brick pulverised with willow charcoal. Celia decided to make her mould by pressing her foot onto the cuttlefish bone, positioned above her object (described on f.?), while Caroline and I decided to press the bone between our knees, described as a suitable method on the same folio.
In lieu of the rooftile mentioned on f.91r, we used terracotta plates, onto which we crushed willow charcoal by hand. This method was relatively slow-going at first, but soon sped up as I went along: in fact, I was a little concerned that I would pare down the cuttlefish bone a little too much, making it too thin for casting. Andrew Lacey suggested that the process could be made even quicker if I used a brick instead of the terracotta, because of its rougher surface: I used this on the second set of cuttlefish bones I used, and it was definitely a much quicker method.

cuttlefish.jpgcuttlefish b.jpg

Pressing the mould and casting


The object I had chosen to mould was a plain ring with no adornments – a very simple design. I began to press the mould by placing my hands on the ‘shells’ of the cuttlefish bones and then placing my hands between my knees and squeezing. The entire process felt very perilous: I felt that the bones might crack at any minute. It was a little like trying to mould something in meringue! Luckily, because my object was pretty simple, I managed to impress it in the cuttlefish bone without creating any major fissures. Or so I thought – after leaving the mould for five minutes, I came back and realised there was a hairline split in the mould that might prove problematic when casting. I therefore repeated the filing and moulding process with another set of bones, this time filing on brick as per Andrew’s suggestion. This also went pretty smoothly. When moulding, I made sure to leave a one-inch perimeter between the edge of the mould and the impressed object, which Andrew had also suggested might be helpful when it came to the casting stage.

After impressing my second set of moulds, I sawed off the top and bottom of the bones to create flat edges as per the manuscript, and then carved an ingate at the top for casting. At this stage I also carved notches in the two bones, so that I could easily align them for the casting process. I also made very shallow vents around the ring impression, radiating outwards. Finally, I bound the bones together with thin metal wire and tape to ensure that they didn’t move when the lead/tin mixture was poured into them.

The metal mixture used for casting was molten tin and lead in a 2:1 ratio. Andrew propped the bones upright in a bowl of sand, and then poured the molten metal into them (we also used the test from the manuscript for determining if the metal mixture was at its correct temperature, dipping a piece of paper into it and seeing if it blackened). The week after, I took apart my cuttlefish bones and removed my cast ring, which looked pretty good! Interestingly, the metal had moved into the very fine sprue vents I had carved outwards from the ring, producing a sun-like effect. Also, the two halves of the ring were slightly misaligned, suggesting that the bones had moved a little during the casting process.

cuttlefish c.jpgcuttlefish d.jpgcuttlefish e.jpgcuttlefish f.jpgcuttlefish g.jpg



ASPECTS TO KEEP IN MIND WHEN MAKING FIELD NOTES